W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2008

Fwd: Re: [WebAIM] Links in context - or not?

From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:49:03 +0100
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20081031174707.03b99810@esat.kuleuven.be>
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

Hi,

>From: "Wayne Dick" <wed@csulb.edu>
>To: "WebAIM Discussion List" <webaim-forum@list.webaim.org>
>Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:43:14 -0700
>Subject: Re: [WebAIM] Links in context - or not?
>
>(...)
>My main hope is that I get an accessibility compliant page.  I
>have preferences on how to meet the standards, but I can do
>something reasonable with compliant code.  Which standard do you
>use, 508, WCAG 1 or 2, other national or state laws the rely on
>WCAG as a base... Most standards cover everything, WCAG 2 is the
>easiest to read and implement.  It doesn't matter.  If the page
>meets standards, assistive technology can to something
>reasonable.

Who had expected this: "WCAG 2 is the easiest to read and implement"?

Best regards,

Christophe


-- 
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD
Research Group on Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442
B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee
BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/
---
Please don't invite me to LinkedIn, Facebook, Quechup or other 
"social networks". You may have agreed to their "privacy policy", but 
I haven't.


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Friday, 31 October 2008 16:49:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:55 GMT