W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2007

RE: WCAG Samurai

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:10:40 -0500
To: "'Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)'" <r.scano@webprofession.com>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-id: <004c01c7abcd$b5f18c20$136fa8c0@NC84301>

Sorry,

Our comments were not meant to reflect on the postings that were made to the
list -- but to future postings and feedback.


Gregg & Loretta
CoChairs.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) [mailto:r.scano@webprofession.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 4:59 AM
> To: 'Gregg Vanderheiden'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> Subject: RE: WCAG Samurai
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf
> Of Gregg Vanderheiden
> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 12:54 AM
> To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> Subject: RE: WCAG Samurai
>
>
> However we have a separate list  WAI-IG for discussions of general
> activities in the field.   This list (GL) is just for discussion of WCAG
> 2.0
> and WCAG Samurai is not about WCAG 2.0
>
>
> ** So we would ask that you restrict your postings on this list (GL) to
> the
> WCAG 2.0 effort. **
>
> Roberto Scano:
> Fully agree with you Gregg.
>
> Gregg:
> We also ask that if people make postings to the Samurai efforts they do so
> constructively and respectfully.  Nothing is gained by generating heat
> instead of light.
>
> Roberto Scano:
> I agree with you: it is more for IG discussion... but is normal that if
> someone post something here to discuss, there are people that can expose
> their personal (and as W3C Member reps.) opinion (here in Italy we see too
> much similar situation, so is possible that we sometime have "not
> politically correct" reasons :D)
>
>
> ---
> Roberto Scano
> International Webmasters Association / The HTML Writers Guild
> http://www.iwanet.org
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 11 June 2007 02:11:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:50 GMT