W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2007

Re: Editorial Survey #1 is up

From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 08:00:00 -0700
Message-ID: <824e742c0705150800m7ad9a2ffhf6c800b3bb734aa4@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Bailey Bruce" <Bailey@access-board.gov>
Cc: "Andi Snow-Weaver" <andisnow@us.ibm.com>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
One problem is that the user may not be able to tell what site an "opaque"
URI is part of, hence how to find the site-specific search engine. So in the
naked URI scenario, it may be necessary to fall back on a generic search
engine.

Loretta

On 5/15/07, Bailey Bruce <Bailey@access-board.gov> wrote:
>
>
> I do not quite follow this logic behind this concern.  As the site owner
> -- the entity claiming conformance -- do you not have control over the
> search engine provided for your site?  Ensuring that *your* search
> engine *continues* to turn up your accessible versions would just be
> part of the requirements as your search engine behavior was revised.
> Why is this not something you could control?  Or control at least as
> well as other content that goes up *after* your initial conformance
> claim.
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 15:00:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:50 GMT