W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2007

RE: Consistency review assignments

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 14:47:39 -0500
To: "'Sean Hayes'" <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>, "'WCAG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <011c01c794ce$6660eb30$136fa8c0@NC84301>

Thanks Sean

Good comment.

Processing now.


Gregg
 -- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sean Hayes
> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 1:45 PM
> To: WCAG
> Subject: RE: Consistency review assignments
>
>
> Finally got round to looking at 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 and found a
> few minor issues:
>
> 2.1.1 -
>
> G90: Providing keyboard-controllable event handlers The
> objective of this technique is to permit individuals who rely
> on a keyboard or keyboard interface to access the
> functionality of the content. To do this, make sure that all
> of the events used in scripts or other interactive controls
> on the page are associated with a keyboard-based event, or
> provide redundant keyboard-based mechanisms to accomplish the
> functionality provided by other device-specific functions.
>
> I don't think this is quite right and also somewhat HTML/JS specific.
>
> Propose:
> G90: Providing keyboard-triggered event handlers The
> objective of this technique is to permit individuals who rely
> on a keyboard or keyboard interface to access the
> functionality of the content. To do this, make sure that all
> event handlers triggered by non-keyboard UI events are also
> associated with a keyboard-based event, or provide redundant
> keyboard-based mechanisms to accomplish the functionality
> provided by other device-specific functions.
>
>
> -------------
> F10: Failure of SC 2.1.1 and Conformance Criterion 7 due to
> combining multiple content formats in a way that traps users
> inside one format type.
>
> Firstly I don't think this is strictly a failure of 2.1.1; so
> suggest just making it a failure for CC#7.
>
> Also:
>
> "Some plug-ins create a common situation in which the
> keyboard focus can become "stuck" in inaccessible"
> -- remove the word common, as we agreed on the telecom for
> another instance of this.
>
> Also this failure does not speak to the required description
> of the method used in the conformance criterion.
>
> --------------
>
> 2.1.2
>
> On reading the description for this I became confused.
>
> "This does not mean that analog, time-dependent input
> (excluded from the requirements of 2.1.1) must be made
> keyboard accessible. Rather, it means that content that uses
> analog, time-dependent input cannot conform to this success
> criterion and therefore cannot meet Guideline 2.1 at Level 3."
>
> Firstly this text needs to be aligned with the new wording for 2.1.1
>
> But secondly,
> I'm not sure of the point of this SC at level 3. If content
> doesn't include the problem content, then level 2 is
> sufficient. If it does contain the problem content, then 3
> can't be met. So 2 needs to be met with the exception.
> Perhaps someone can explain this one to me.
>
>
> Sean Hayes
> Standards and Policy Team
> Corporate Accessibility Group
> Microsoft
> Phone:
>   mob +44 7977 455002
>   office +44 117 9719730
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Loretta Guarino Reid
> Sent: 21 April 2007 15:17
> To: WCAG
> Subject: Re: Consistency review assignments
>
>
> Just to clarify, the most recent versions of the Guidelines,
> Understanding, and Techniques documents can be found at:
>
> Guidelines:  http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/
> Understanding:
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/
> Techniques: http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-TECHS/
>
> They are subtitles "Editor's Draft February/March 2007".
>
> Thanks, Loretta
>
> On 4/20/07, Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com> wrote:
> > As we mentioned on Thursday, we need everyone's help in
> reviewing our
> > documents for consistency. As we have changed out success criteria,
> > the Understanding and Technique documents have not always
> tracked the
> > changes.
> >
> > We've assigned the Guidelines and Success Criteria to different
> > working group members. Please look at the success criterion, its
> > Understanding document, and the techniques associated. Look for
> > vocabulary changes (e.g. Web unit, baseline), techniques that need
> > modification, etc.
> >
> > If issues are editorial,  email the suggested changes to
> Ben. If you
> > find changes that are non-editorial and would require
> survey, please
> > update the wiki to match the internal draft and then
> incorporate the
> > proposed changes. This will make it easier for us to easily
> figure out
> > what the changes are as well as simplify the process of creating
> > surveys for the proposed changes.
> >
> > We would like this review done by next Friday, April 27. If
> you won't
> > be able to do this, please let us know as soon as possible. Early
> > submissions appreciated.
> >
> > Feel free to swap assignments among yourselves if you would like to
> > work on something different.
> >
> > The assignments can also be found on the wiki page
> >
> http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Consistency_Review#Wor
> > king_Group_Member_Assignments
> > .
> > Please indicate the status of your work in the wiki.
> >
> > Thanks, Loretta
> >
> >     *  Andi Snow-Weaver (Just the GL Understanding docs) GL 1.1, GL
> > 1.2, GL 1.3, GL 1.4, GL 2.1, GL 2.2, GL 2.3, GL 2.4, GL
> 3.1, GL 3.2,
> > GL 3.3, GL 4.1
> >     * Alex Li 1.4.1, 1.4.2, 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3, 3.3.6
> >     * Bengt Farre 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.3, 1.2.4
> >     * Bruce Bailey 1.2.5, 1.2.6, 1.2.7
> >     * Christophe Strobbe 1.3.2, 1.3.3, 1.3.4, 1.3.5
> >     * Cynthia Shelley 1.4.1, 1.4.3, 1.4.5, 1.4.6
> >     * Sean Hayes 2.1.1, 2.1.2
> >     * David MacDonald 1.3.1
> >     * Don Evans 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.2.3
> >     * Gregg Vanderheiden 1.4.2, 1.4.4, 2.3.1, 2.3.2
> >     * Katie Haritos-Shea 2.2.3, 2.2.5, 2.2.5, 2.2.6
> >     * Loretta Guarino Reid 1.1.1, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.4.7, 2.4.9
> >     * Makoto Ueki 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.1.3, 3.1.6
> >     * Sofia Celic 3.1.4, 3.1.5, 3.3.4, 3.3.5
> >     * Tim Boland 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.2.5
> >     * Roberto Ellero 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.4.3, 2.4.4, 2.4.8
> >
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 12 May 2007 19:47:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:50 GMT