W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2007

RE: Editorial Survey #1 is up

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:23:08 -0500
To: "'Bailey Bruce'" <Bailey@Access-Board.gov>
Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <010c01c793e8$ab6112f0$136fa8c0@NC84301>


Bruce

The document title would not be available if the person landed on an opaque
web page (a Web page that was of a new technology that the persons AT did
not support).   The only thing the user would know would be the URI of the
project.   This might be
1)	www.example.com/docs/g452.foo
2)	www.ecample.com/docserver?dn=g452.foo
or some such.

Unless the accessible version  (e.g.  g452.html) has "g452.foo" as open text
somewhere on it - you would not ordinarily be able to find it from the
filename of the inaccessible version.



Gregg
 -- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bailey Bruce
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 7:45 AM
> To: Gregg Vanderheiden
> Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Editorial Survey #1 is up
>
>
> Gregg, and everyone else, could you please post examples of
> documents where searches on the root file name or document
> title fail to turn up HTML versions?  The caveat of course,
> is confidence that the HTML version is posted on the same site!
>
>
Received on Friday, 11 May 2007 16:23:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:50 GMT