W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2007

RE: Consistency review assignments

From: David MacDonald <befree@magma.ca>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:50:44 -0400
To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lorettaguarino@google.com>, "'WCAG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <002101c78855$553d58f0$ffb80ad0$@ca>

I have completed a review of 1.3.1. There were no identifiable
inconsistencies in the language in the SC the related "How to Meet" document
and the associated techniques. The only minor thing is that in the "how to
meet", the links to the techniques document are not listed in their order of
number (ie. They are listed H51, H39, H73, H63 etc...). I don't find this to
be a problem but I mention it in case someone else does. 

David MacDonald

access empowers people...
        ...barriers disable them...
 
www.eramp.com

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Loretta Guarino Reid
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 10:17 AM
To: WCAG
Subject: Re: Consistency review assignments


Just to clarify, the most recent versions of the Guidelines,
Understanding, and Techniques documents can be found at:

Guidelines:  http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/
Understanding:  http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/
Techniques: http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-TECHS/

They are subtitles "Editor's Draft February/March 2007".

Thanks, Loretta

On 4/20/07, Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com> wrote:
> As we mentioned on Thursday, we need everyone's help in reviewing our
> documents for consistency. As we have changed out success criteria,
> the Understanding and Technique documents have not always tracked the
> changes.
>
> We've assigned the Guidelines and Success Criteria to different
> working group members. Please look at the success criterion, its
> Understanding document, and the techniques associated. Look for
> vocabulary changes (e.g. Web unit, baseline), techniques that need
> modification, etc.
>
> If issues are editorial,  email the suggested changes to Ben. If you
> find changes that are non-editorial and would require survey, please
> update the wiki to match the
> internal draft and then incorporate the proposed changes. This will
> make it easier for us to easily figure out what the changes are as well
> as simplify the process of creating surveys for the proposed changes.
>
> We would like this review done by next Friday, April 27. If you won't
> be able to do this, please let us know as soon as possible. Early
> submissions appreciated.
>
> Feel free to swap assignments among yourselves if you would like to
> work on something different.
>
> The assignments can also be found on the wiki page
>
http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Consistency_Review#Working_G
roup_Member_Assignments
> .
> Please indicate the status of your work in the wiki.
>
> Thanks, Loretta
>
>     *  Andi Snow-Weaver (Just the GL Understanding docs) GL 1.1, GL
> 1.2, GL 1.3, GL 1.4, GL 2.1, GL 2.2, GL 2.3, GL 2.4, GL 3.1, GL 3.2,
> GL 3.3, GL 4.1
>     * Alex Li 1.4.1, 1.4.2, 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3, 3.3.6
>     * Bengt Farre 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.3, 1.2.4
>     * Bruce Bailey 1.2.5, 1.2.6, 1.2.7
>     * Christophe Strobbe 1.3.2, 1.3.3, 1.3.4, 1.3.5
>     * Cynthia Shelley 1.4.1, 1.4.3, 1.4.5, 1.4.6
>     * Sean Hayes 2.1.1, 2.1.2
>     * David MacDonald 1.3.1
>     * Don Evans 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.2.3
>     * Gregg Vanderheiden 1.4.2, 1.4.4, 2.3.1, 2.3.2
>     * Katie Haritos-Shea 2.2.3, 2.2.5, 2.2.5, 2.2.6
>     * Loretta Guarino Reid 1.1.1, 2.4.5, 2.4.6, 2.4.7, 2.4.9
>     * Makoto Ueki 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.1.3, 3.1.6
>     * Sofia Celic 3.1.4, 3.1.5, 3.3.4, 3.3.5
>     * Tim Boland 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 3.2.5
>     * Roberto Ellero 2.4.1, 2.4.2, 2.4.3, 2.4.4, 2.4.8
>
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2007 22:51:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:50 GMT