For sake of argument, let us assume we go with the most liberal (i.e., potentially least accessible) of the proposals: <blockquote> 1. Conforms at level 1 where controlled 2. No 3rd party content is controlled </blockquote> Is there still the expectation (for WCAG 2.0 Single A claim) that the aggregator explicitly provide a mechanism for the 3rd party content to be accessible (even if it is not forced). For example, if an aggregator allows uploading of photos, must they provide a text field for ALT value? If an aggregator allows uploading of video, must they provide a means to provide synchronized captions? If so, is this a separate SC or part of the conformance scoping?Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 23:44:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 16 February 2017 16:49:19 UTC