W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: REVISED Web Page Proposal - Version 2.0

From: Carlos A Velasco <Carlos.Velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 20:07:35 +0100
Message-ID: <454CE4F7.40904@fit.fraunhofer.de>
To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

see thread on:
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2006JanMar/0216.html>

and
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2006Aug/0007.html>

among others.

regards,
carlos

Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
> Can you send me your past posts on this? 
> We are working on this issue right now and they would be useful
> 
> Thanks 
> 
> Gregg
>  -- ------------------------------ 
> Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
> 
>  
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org 
>> [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Carlos A Velasco
>> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 2:39 PM
>> To: Gregg Vanderheiden
>> Cc: 'Jason White'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: REVISED Web Page Proposal - Version 2.0
>>
>>
>> Hi Gregg,
>>
>> Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
>>> Jason is correct.
>>>
>>> What was proposed was:
>>>
>>> Anything that is invoked by the primary resource is part of 
>> the web page.
>>> If there are multiple primary resources that can be obtained by 
>>> content negotiation from a URI - then each would be a web page.  In 
>>> conformance we say that if negotiation fails then the 
>> accessible version would be served.
>>> If there are arguments in the URI then it is a different URI  (e.g.
>>> example.com/pagename?xx=yy )
>> Of course, that is already in the definition of URI (BTW, 
>> that is a GET, not a POST, which is the issue Johannes posted 
>> in his previous email; in POST requests, the URI is the same, 
>> only the HTTP request changes). I think the issue that is 
>> eluded here like the pest, is that *a URI is not enough to 
>> identify any Web Page or Web Unit*, or whatever you want to 
>> call it. We have posted several problematic examples in the 
>> past with no reply.
>>
>> The issue has been, by the way :-), also identified by the 
>> work in EARL, to identify *Test Subjects*. See more in:
>>
>> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/WD-HTTP-in-RDF-20060705>
>>
>> regards,
>> carlos
>> --
>> Dr Carlos A Velasco - http://access.fit.fraunhofer.de/ 
>> Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Informationstechnik FIT
>>   [Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT)]
>>   Barrierefreie Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie für Alle
>>   Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany)
>>   Tel: +49-2241-142609 Fax: +49-2241-1442609
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
Dr Carlos A Velasco - http://access.fit.fraunhofer.de/
Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Informationstechnik FIT
  [Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT)]
  Barrierefreie Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie für Alle
  Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany)
  Tel: +49-2241-142609 Fax: +49-2241-1442609
Received on Saturday, 4 November 2006 19:07:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:47 GMT