W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2006

RE: 1.1 level 3 SC

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:42:28 -0600
To: "'Bailey, Bruce'" <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <006901c65382$0f496540$ee8cfea9@NC6000BAK>

This is already required.

At level 2 you need to provide audio description. 

So if you are at level 3 and do the text -- you already passed the audio
description requirement.  



Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 
The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b 

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Bailey, Bruce
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 12:59 PM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: 1.1 level 3 SC


> Or do we want to use the same 'screenplay' at L3 as at L1 ? 

I agree with John and Loretta that wording should be consistent between
levels.

> Since we have a strong text equivalent option for multimedia at 1.2 L1 -
do we really want a weak one at level 3 of 1.1?  

How about requiring *both* Audio Description and full corrected screenplay
at level 3?

That is, for L1 the site has a choice of AD or screenplay.  For L3 claim,
site must provide both.  This way, providing the full corrected screenplay
does satisfy this particular SC at Triple A "for free".  If the site is
going for Triple A, they still have to do some extra work.

Is there a need to further qualify that some kinds of video don't really
benefit from Audio Description, and therefore AD is not required?  Is it
legitimate for a site with nothing but talking head type videos (captioned
of course) to claim they satisfy Level 1?  Or, since a talking head type
video gains little from audio description, *must* a site provide full
corrected screenplay to satisfy Level 1?
Received on Wednesday, 29 March 2006 22:42:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:45 GMT