W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2006

RE: 1.1 level 3 SC

From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lguarino@adobe.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:10:10 -0800
Message-ID: <0DAF2B31FBCEB6439F63FA7F91601F74A5BF8A@namail3.corp.adobe.com>
To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I think we still want the level 3 success criterion (in case level 1 was
satisfied by providing audio description). But we should use the same
'screenplay'.
 

Loretta Guarino Reid 
lguarino@adobe.com 
Adobe Systems, Acrobat Engineering 

 


________________________________

	From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org
[mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gregg Vanderheiden
	Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:56 PM
	To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
	Subject: 1.1 level 3 SC
	
	

	I was thinking - since we have a strong text equivalent option
for multimedia at 1.2 L1 - do we really want a weak one at level 3 of
1.1?  

	 

	Or do we want to use the same 'screenplay' at L3 as at L1 ? 

	 

	Makes it harder for L3 but L3 items are optional.    And only a
screenplay would really give the full information to someone who was
deafblind. 

	 

	Thoughts? 

	 

	
	Gregg
	
	------------------------

	Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
	Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
	Director - Trace R & D Center 
	University of Wisconsin-Madison 
	<http://trace.wisc.edu/ <http://trace.wisc.edu/> > FAX
608/262-8848  
	For a list of our list discussions http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/

	The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b 

	  <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/> 

	 

	 
Received on Wednesday, 29 March 2006 06:11:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:45 GMT