W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2006

RE: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section.

From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 10:01:26 +0100
To: <paulwalsh@segala.com>, <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20060312035331.SM02600@Inbox>

I totally agree!

----- Messaggio originale -----
    Da: "Paul Walsh, Segala"<paulwalsh@segala.com>
    Inviato: 11/03/06 23.12.22
    A: "'Gregg Vanderheiden'"<gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
    Oggetto: RE: CONFORMANCE  issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. 
     1786 Suggest using EARL for conformance claims 
    conformance section should refer to the possibility of using EARL to
    provide machine-readable conformance claims.
    [PW] Perhaps the group would consider using the output of the W3C's first
    incubator activity for conformance claims?
    That is, the Web Content Label (WCL) [1]. The Mobile Web Initiative (MWI)
    mobileOK Trustmark
    will come in the form of a Content Label, with no visual icons to represent
    It makes sense to me to use EARL for recording test descriptions, test cases
    etc. and a Content Label
    to make conformance claims. Content Labelling is becoming increasingly
    popular by many
    associations that have their own code of conduct, so there are numerous real
    use cases within the industry already. 
    I'm interested to hear the groups thoughts on this one - I know Shadi might
    have a different opinion :)

[Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per recuperare la restante parte.]
Received on Sunday, 12 March 2006 08:55:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:59 UTC