W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2006

RE: Definition of baseline

From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:12:01 +0100
Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20060222104832.03054150@mailserv.esat.kuleuven.be>
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org


At 08:57 22/02/2006, Kerstin Goldsmith wrote:
<blockquote>
What are we thinking a baseline will actually look like in written 
form?  In other words, do we have examples to add to the definition/s 
below?  I think that with examples we will be able to see if the proposed 
definition works, or needs work.
</blockquote>

At 10:25 22/02/2006, Gregg Vanderheiden responded:
<blockquote>
It would be a list of technologies
We have a doc on it somewhere.  Have to look for it.
</blockquote>

The first version is at 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005OctDec/att-0493/baseline_overview_draft.htm.
An edited version is at 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005OctDec/att-0507/baseline_overview_draft_editsCS.html.
It was discussed in the 17 November telecon: 
http://www.w3.org/2005/11/17-wai-wcag-minutes.html#item01.

I imagine that some people would be interested in a machine-readable 
baseline definition, for example in RDF.

I also wonder if just listing technologies is a bit too simplistic: it 
assumes that all features of a technology are supported, including, for 
example, in the case of HTML 4.01, the object element, the optgroup 
element, the link element for navigation, and the longdesc attribute. 
(Since support has been getting better these are not the best examples, but 
SVG support has similar issues.) What if authors use embed instead of 
object? This can happen when the customer sets the baseline (see note 4 in 
Gregg's proposed definition) and wants embed instead of object.
If someone (customer and/or developer) decides that certain a repair 
technique will be used because the preferred markup feature (that would 
fulfill the same purpose) is not sufficiently supported, should it be 
possible to exlude that markup feature from the baseline? If yes, that 
would provide a mechanism to explain the presence of the repair technique.

Regards,

Christophe


-- 
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on 
Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/ 


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2006 10:12:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:42 GMT