W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: link DEFINITION

From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:40:23 +0100
Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20060222103328.0329b768@mailserv.esat.kuleuven.be>
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

Hi Gregg,

At 09:03 22/02/2006, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
<blockquote>
Our definition of LINK is more than a definition.

It also includes judgments as to what the SC means.

Can we think of a way to qualify this so we don't have to say this in the 
definition?

Maybe use  "User Links"   or  "hyperlink"  or something

Here is what we have


link

hyperlink between the current document and a single destination.

NOTE: "Link" refers to a single "arc" in the XML Linking Language (XLink) 
Version 1.0 specification.) Only links that are available to be activated 
by the user need to meet accessibility requirements. This excludes links 
that are activated automatically or programmatically.
</blockquote>

Unless I overlooked something, the term 'link' is not used in the success 
criteria (November 2005 public draft or 17 January 2006 internal draft).
SC 2.4.5 uses the term 'programmatic reference', and the thread that 
started at 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2006JanMar/0043.html tried 
to find a more readable term. 'Hyperlink' was seen as to closely associated 
with HTTP; but 'hyperlinks and other programmatic references' was also 
suggested.

Regards,

Christophe

-- 
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on 
Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/ 


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2006 09:39:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:42 GMT