W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units)

From: Carlos A Velasco <Carlos.Velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 11:07:56 +0100
Message-ID: <43F05A7C.2060304@fit.fraunhofer.de>
To: Yvette Hoitink <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>
Cc: 'Gregg Vanderheiden' <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

Ivette,

The problem is not the DU, but the conformance statement.

carlos

Yvette Hoitink wrote:
> ...
> 
> Hi Carlos,
> 
> It seems to me you and Gregg agree! A standalone image does not conform to
> WCAG because it should only be considered in context (with HTML that
> includes alt, longdesc, etc). 
> 
> The problem is that an Image meets the current definition of Delivery Unit.
> Gregg was merely pointing out the problem with that: that images are now
> required to conform by themselves. Because that was never intended, Gregg
> and others have been trying to find a better term so it is clear standalone
> image don't need to conform but only in context. 
> 
> Yvette Hoitink
> Heritas, Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands
> E-mail: y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl
> WWW: http://www.heritas.nl 
> 
> 

-- 
Dr Carlos A Velasco - http://access.fit.fraunhofer.de/
Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Informationstechnik FIT
   [Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT)]
   Barrierefreie Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie für Alle
   Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany)
   Tel: +49-2241-142609 Fax: +49-2241-1442609
Received on Monday, 13 February 2006 10:08:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:42 GMT