W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2006

RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:51:20 -0600
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00e501c62e72$fb827c60$ee8cfea9@NC6000BAK>

>> Are there ambitions to avoid all references to Delivery Unit as well?

Yes


>> Okay, then just substituting Web Units for Delivery Units in 2.4.4,
delivery units have titles, doesn't work.

Actually it does work, but it doesn't cover frames is all.  Need to be sure
that frames need titles under a different provision.  



Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 
The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b 

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Bailey, Bruce
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:54 AM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units


> So we aren't using perceivable units at all.

Great!  The glossary definition for content needs to be reworked then.  The
current entry makes use of *both* Perceiveable Units and Delivery Unit.
Substituting Web Unit for both results in nonsense.

Are there ambitions to avoid all references to Delivery Unit as well?

> If the parts of a frame are not intended to be viewed separately then they
are not Web Units.   

Okay, then just substituting Web Units for Delivery Units in 2.4.4, delivery
units have titles, doesn't work.
Received on Friday, 10 February 2006 18:51:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:42 GMT