W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2006

RE: Techniques Task Force Meeting

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:37:31 -0600
To: "'Kerstin Goldsmith'" <kerstin.goldsmith@oracle.com>
Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <002201c61ca1$4c7d99d0$ee8cfea9@NC6000BAK>

We only need to have one technique per sc per situation.  Not per
technology.   There are many technologies at all stages of development and

It would be good to have techniques across a range of technologies.  But
there is no set set of technologies. 


 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 

-----Original Message-----
From: Kerstin Goldsmith [mailto:kerstin.goldsmith@oracle.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 6:24 PM
To: Gregg Vanderheiden
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Re: Techniques Task Force Meeting


Are we going to have "at least one technique for each situation" for a
defined set of technologies (at least one per technology)? If so, what is
the list of technologies beyond HTML and CSS?


Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:

>Per previous post - we are having a special techniques drafting meeting 
>this week.  The approval by the working group of the task force and the 
>meeting was unanimous.  The new approved work statement is available at:
>http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2006/01/wttf-draft.html   (we will remove "DRAFT"
>label tomorrow)
>The task force will be going through all of the success criteria in the 
>Understanding WCAG 2.0 document and identify at least one technique for 
>each situation - and be sure there at least rough draft writeups and 
>tests for them.
>These will all then be reviewed and forwarded by the teams and the full 
>working group.
>Gregg and John
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2006 02:37:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:58 UTC