> There is no common failure about failing SC 4.1.1 when CSS is invalid. Yes, I didn't see a failure listed that's why I'm asking. The SC seems to be very clear that this would be a failure and, at level 1, would be overkill. > BTW, what is validity with respect to CSS? Correct grammar according to > the grammar defined in the spec? Correct usage of vocabulary defined in > the spec? > -- I'm not sure myself and not sure if Björn's earlier message cleared this up. The W3C's validator can give a CSS file a rating of "valid" while still producing many warnings. For example the WCAG2's style sheet is "valid" with warnings: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2FWCAG20%2Fslicenav.css&usermedium=all Cheers, ChrisReceived on Friday, 9 June 2006 19:42:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 02:51:32 GMT