W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2006

Re: CSS Parsed Unambiguously

From: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 15:42:02 -0400
Message-ID: <1cb001c68bfc$c77dd5d0$e29a968e@WILDDOG>
To: "Johannes Koch" <koch@w3development.de>, "WAI WCAG List" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

> There is no common failure about failing SC 4.1.1 when CSS is invalid.
Yes, I didn't see a failure listed that's why I'm asking. The SC seems to be 
very clear that this would be a failure and, at level 1, would be overkill.

> BTW, what is validity with respect to CSS? Correct grammar according to 
> the grammar defined in the spec? Correct usage of vocabulary defined in 
> the spec?
> -- 
I'm not sure myself and not sure if Björn's earlier message cleared this up.

The W3C's validator can give a CSS file a rating of "valid" while still 
producing many warnings. For example the WCAG2's style sheet is "valid" with 

Received on Friday, 9 June 2006 19:42:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:34:00 UTC