W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2006

#LC-484

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 17:32:55 -0500
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00cc01c67938$ad9747e0$ee8cfea9@NC6000BAK>
#LC-484  

Jason White   5/2/2006  

W2       

Conformance                

ED       

 


Comment 


"If individual authored units do not carry a conformance claim, then the
claim must be based on the Web unit with the authored units in place."

 

      This is expressed in terms of claims rather than in terms of
conformance. It should be more accurately stated thus: 

"If individual authored units do not carry conformance claims, then the
conformance of any Web units in which they occur is determined as the level
of conformance, if any, attained by those Web units with all aggregated
content in place".

            


Proposed Change 


"See wording proposed above [in COMMENT]"  

 


Suggested resolution from Team A


Accepted

Adopting a shorter wording however as follows.

"If individual authored units do not carry conformance claims, then the
conformance of any Web unit is determined with all aggregated content in
place".

 

 

 

 
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2006 22:33:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:46 GMT