W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

RE: Schedule for getting to Last Call

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 16:23:23 -0600
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <011301c6067d$2850f230$ee8cfea9@NC6000BAK>
 Hi Bruce,

 

We're sorry that you are offended.   The call for public comments ends
today.  We have been monitoring the comments as each came in.    We look
forward to the rest that may come in later today.  If late breaking comments
bring up a problem that can't possibly be fixed in two months of meetings so
that we need to do another round, then we will do so.  But if not - then we
need to alert our team to, and open discussion on the last call timing. 

 

Regards,  


Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 

 

 


  _____  


From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Bailey, Bruce
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 3:54 PM
To: john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Re: Schedule for getting to Last Call

Is it not the least bit arrogant to be publicly planning how to get to Last
Call *before* the last Call for Public Review is even over?  Are you not
advertising that the mere public can't possible have anything of value to
say that would throw off your intended schedule?  Yes, I too am disappointed
that you are not getting more feedback, but that is not much of a
justification IMHO.

Please excuse the sig, I am too offended to wait to reply.

--
Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld.  Pls 4giv shrt hnd, tyops, and
mispellings.


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Sent: Wed Dec 21 16:03:23 2005
Subject: Schedule for getting to Last Call


Here we go!!


Schedule for Getting WCAG 2.0 to Last Call
Rev. 21 December 2005

Important Deadlines
16 February 2006 (Thursday): WG approves publication of Last Call
Working Draft
17 February 2006 (Friday): Formal publication request
20 February 2006: Last Call Working Draft published
Schedule for Thursday telcons, 22 December 2005-16 February 2006
The Working Group will review techniques and proposals to close
remaining Category 1 issues according to the following schedule:
22 December: Team task force assignments, Issues for 2.4, 2.1, 3.2, 4.1
and misc. proposals from list.
5 January: Techniques, tests and Category 1 issues for guidelines 1.1,
1.3, 2.1
12 January: Techniques, tests and Category 1 issues for guidelines 1.4,
2.4, 2.2
19 January: Techniques, tests and Category 1 issues for guidelines 1.2,
3.1, 2.5
26 January: Techniques, tests and Category 1 issues for guidelines 2.3,
3.2, 4.1, 4.2
2 February: Review of remaining Category 1 issues and techniques drafts.
9 February: Review of remaining Category 1 issues and techniques drafts.
16 February: Review and approve content for Last Call Working Draft.

Instructions and team assignments will follow in a separate message.



John and Gregg

"Good design is accessible design."
John Slatin, Ph.D.
Director, Accessibility Institute
University of Texas at Austin
FAC 248C
1 University Station G9600
Austin, TX 78712
ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524
email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu
web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/
Received on Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:23:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:41 GMT