W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

R: CLOSED: Issue #344

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 09:43:12 +0100
To: "'Gregg Vanderheiden'" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <011701c6008a$6d4e6960$0200a8c0@rsnbiwa>

Here is the study:

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] Per conto
di Gregg Vanderheiden
Inviato: marted́ 13 dicembre 2005 17.29
A: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Oggetto: RE: CLOSED: Issue #344


We looked at lightness (L) as part of our work.  We found that, depending on
the values you choose, you end up with comparable results to the algorithm
proposed.   The one we proposed however seemed to perform better at lower
black end.   I will forward comparisons - though it is a bit involved since
they didn't specify what the threshold values should be. 

The key to either approach would be to define the threshold values.  The
link you pointed to provides an equation but no values for the threshold.
Further, the tests to date have only been carried out on subjects without
vision impairments.   They are hypothesizing research with people who have
vision deficits but there has been none to date.   If we were to use this in
our guidelines (which is a possibility) we would need to have values for the
threshold within the next 3 months.   What values would they propose for
level 2 and 3?   What would it be based on?    Could they come up with them
within the next month?

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 10:05 AM
To: chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca; gv@trace.wisc.edu; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Re: CLOSED: Issue #344

Here is it:

----- Messaggio originale -----
    Da: "Chris Ridpath"<chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
    Inviato: 13/12/05 16.45.40
    A: "Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)"<rscano@iwa-italy.org>,
    Oggetto: Re: CLOSED: Issue #344
    Thanks for the information. I agree with Gez that it looks sensible and 
    > Hi, there is also the italian algorithm proposed in the list.
    Roberto - Sorry I couldn't find it. Could you provide a link?

[Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per recuperare
la restante parte.]
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2005 08:43:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:57 UTC