RE: clean AND CORRECTED guideline1.1_proposal.html

I think that one thing is video (video recognized format served as object), another thing is animation (like animated gifs).

----- Messaggio originale -----
    Da: "Gregg Vanderheiden"<gv@trace.wisc.edu>
    Inviato: 01/12/05 20.55.36
    A: "'Andrew Kirkpatrick'"<akirkpatrick@macromedia.com>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
    Oggetto: RE: clean AND CORRECTED  guideline1.1_proposal.html
    
    Can you suggest one? 
    
     
    
    
    Gregg
    
     -- ------------------------------ 
    Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
    Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
    Director - Trace R & D Center 
    University of Wisconsin-Madison 
    
     
    
     
    
    
      _____  
    
    
    From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
    Of Andrew Kirkpatrick
    Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 7:39 AM
    To: Gregg Vanderheiden; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
    Subject: RE: clean AND CORRECTED guideline1.1_proposal.html
    
    It seems that the issue is in how 'video' is defined.  I'd like to say that
    video includes animated content, not just recorded real images.  Can a
    definition for video be added?
    
    AWK
    
     
    
     
    
    Can you suggest wording to include in success criterion or in HOW TO MEET?
    
     
    
     
    
    Gregg,
    
    How is 'video' defined? Is a long animation 'video'?  (e.g.
    http://site.aol.com/accessibility/press/sample.html).  In terms of what
    users need, there is no difference between this and a recorded movie of
    actual events, but there is a little ambiguity.
    
     
    
    

[Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per recuperare la restante parte.]

Received on Thursday, 1 December 2005 20:11:18 UTC