W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

RE: clean AND CORRECTED guideline1.1_proposal.html

From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 21:11:35 +0100
To: <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <akirkpatrick@macromedia.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200512011508109.SM04608@Inbox>

I think that one thing is video (video recognized format served as object), another thing is animation (like animated gifs).

----- Messaggio originale -----
    Da: "Gregg Vanderheiden"<gv@trace.wisc.edu>
    Inviato: 01/12/05 20.55.36
    A: "'Andrew Kirkpatrick'"<akirkpatrick@macromedia.com>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
    Oggetto: RE: clean AND CORRECTED  guideline1.1_proposal.html
    Can you suggest one? 
     -- ------------------------------ 
    Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
    Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
    Director - Trace R & D Center 
    University of Wisconsin-Madison 
    From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
    Of Andrew Kirkpatrick
    Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 7:39 AM
    To: Gregg Vanderheiden; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
    Subject: RE: clean AND CORRECTED guideline1.1_proposal.html
    It seems that the issue is in how 'video' is defined.  I'd like to say that
    video includes animated content, not just recorded real images.  Can a
    definition for video be added?
    Can you suggest wording to include in success criterion or in HOW TO MEET?
    How is 'video' defined? Is a long animation 'video'?  (e.g.
    http://site.aol.com/accessibility/press/sample.html).  In terms of what
    users need, there is no difference between this and a recorded movie of
    actual events, but there is a little ambiguity.

[Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per recuperare la restante parte.]
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2005 20:11:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:57 UTC