W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

RE: clean AND CORRECTED guideline1.1_proposal.html

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpatrick@macromedia.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 05:38:55 -0800
Message-ID: <DC9D05204B1E16419D62C12561C9322106A91558@p01exm01.macromedia.com>
To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
It seems that the issue is in how 'video' is defined.  I'd like to say
that video includes animated content, not just recorded real images.
Can a definition for video be added?

	Can you suggest wording to include in success criterion or in




	How is 'video' defined? Is a long animation 'video'?  (e.g.
http://site.aol.com/accessibility/press/sample.html).  In terms of what
users need, there is no difference between this and a recorded movie of
actual events, but there is a little ambiguity.

Received on Thursday, 1 December 2005 13:40:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:57 UTC