- From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 16:19:13 +1100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 03:45:45PM -0500, Tim Boland wrote: > > SC 2.3.2 states: > > "Content does not violate general flash threshold or red flash threshold" > > How should this sentence be parsed? What rules of precedence should apply? I would interpret the "or" as an inclusive disjunction: content does not violate the general flash threshold, the red flash threshold or both. I think Gregg's restatement in this thread is clearer, though.
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2005 05:19:38 UTC