W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: R: Congratulations !!

From: Maurizio Boscarol <maurizio@usabile.it>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:03:44 +0100
Message-ID: <438743F0.20602@usabile.it>
To: "Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
CC: gv@trace.wisc.edu, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) wrote:

>----- Messaggio originale -----
>    Da: "Maurizio Boscarol"<maurizio@usabile.it>
>    Inviato: 25/11/05 17.32.37
>    A: "Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)"<rscano@iwa-italy.org>
>    Cc: "gv@trace.wisc.edu"<gv@trace.wisc.edu>, "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>    Oggetto: Re: R: Congratulations !!
>    
>    Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) wrote:
>    
>    >    
>    >    Maurizio Boscarol sent a Friday, November 25, 2005 7:03 AM message with
>    >    the topic "Re: R: Congratulations !!";
>    >    
>    >    "We are doing technical requirements for products or processes, not
>    >    laws. Sad, but someone can't see the difference." 
>    >
>    >Roberto:
>    >Yes, but don't cry like a crocodile if nobody apply wcag "as is" for national law.
>    >I want to remember that one of the scope for what WAI was financed by EU was to have appicable standards.
>    >
>    
>    Are you pulling my leg? Admit it!.. Well, or you misunderstood me.
>    
>    To be clear: I *never* wanted wcag be a law. You want, not me! :) I 
>
>Roberto:
>No Me, but wai
>  
>

I don't know if this is true, but my points hold anyway, of course.
There's a strong difference between law and standard, for the reason I 
already pointed out.

With this are you saying that you personally don't want the wcag be a 
law? So I misunderstood you for all these years? ;-) Can you confirm? 
You don't want wcag be a law?... ;-) It would be a good new. :)

M
Received on Friday, 25 November 2005 16:53:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:40 GMT