W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: validity.htm

From: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 16:11:44 -0500
Message-ID: <04cc01c5e572$30607f30$e29a968e@WILDDOG>
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
It's still not clear which standard(s) we're discussing on the list or on the surveys.

It's impossible to answer question 1 in the survey [1] without a listed standard. I suggest the survey questions include a standard like:

1) I support validity to XHTML strict.
2) I support validity to HTML transitional
3) I support validity to a DTD that allows anything except what is proven to affect accessibility.
4) I don't support validity to any standard however I do support structure (e.g.  tables must be properly nested)


[1] <http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/use-spec2/>
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2005 21:13:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:57 UTC