RE: validity.htm

>  Roberto:
> If they declare wcag 1.0 double A they must have valid code. 
> If they have a wcag 1.0 level A focus, the real accessibility 
> is really poor.

Sorry. I meant accessible to users, not to guidelines.  The study I'd
like to see is a study of sites where the developer had accessibility as
a goal and those sites divided into two groups - those where validity
was or was not an additional goal.  The accessibility would be measured
by users, not by WCAG/508/CLF/etc. criteria. That would be a fairer
comparison that would remove the mass of developers who care neither
about validity nor accessibility.

AWK