W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: Summary of arguments FOR validity -- and another against -- and a third of alternatives

From: Carlos A Velasco <Carlos.Velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:51:25 +0100
Message-ID: <437058FD.1060506@fit.fraunhofer.de>
To: Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

Hi Becky,

With the due respect, ..

Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com wrote:
> a level 1 validation requirement may prevent innovation of new 
> technologies that use new attributes not included in current 
> specifications (for example implementation of the DHTML roadmap [5]  using 
> HTML).
> ...
> [5] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/roadmap/DHTMLRoadmap110505.html

that argument does not hold. The roadmap is defining extensions, and 
thus they define new attributes, namespaces, etc. You *should be able to 
validate* against these extensions, which I hope we can do when PF 
finishes that piece of work.

BTW, this argument of *validity against innovation*, I heard it many 
times, but replacing validity with accessibility. Very surprised to hear 
it in this forum, though.


Dr Carlos A Velasco - http://access.fit.fraunhofer.de/
Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Informationstechnik FIT
   [Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT)]
   Barrierefreie Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie für Alle
   Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany)
   Tel: +49-2241-142609 Fax: +49-2241-1442609
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 07:51:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:57 UTC