W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: Validity as a technique

From: Matt May <mcmay@bestkungfu.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:05:06 -0800
Message-Id: <CD9ACA97-928F-4078-A4ED-5758C72E145D@bestkungfu.com>
Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
To: "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>
What I mean is that I'd be comfortable if the main WCAG 2 document  
did not contain mention of HTML validity at the principle, guideline  
or success criterion level, but did appear in the techniques document.


On Nov 7, 2005, at 6:17 PM, Bailey, Bruce wrote:

> Please forgive my peevishness here...
> > Omitting HTML validity at the guideline level would be acceptable  
> to me.
> Did you mean guideline level or SC level?  I missed the guideline  
> referencing validity, so now I am worried.
> > I think the language already in the guidelines document is  
> sufficient guidance.
> By “guidelines document” do you mean WCAG 2 working draft or the  
> supplement techniques documents used for guidance?
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2005 04:05:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:40 GMT