W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: Validity as a technique

From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:56:54 +0100
To: <koch@w3development.de>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200511071650203.SM02800@Inbox>

Yes, is what i'm trying to say from my first post. I don't understand why we need to converge to a "mediation" if this is so clear...

----- Messaggio originale -----
    Da: "Johannes Koch"<koch@w3development.de>
    Inviato: 07/11/05 22.27.23
    A: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
    Oggetto: Re: Validity as a technique
    Yvette Hoitink wrote:
    > * We do not require it in the normative section (the guidelines), which
    > prevents legal actions against websites that are accessible but do not
    > validate because they used an attribute that isn't defined in the specs.
    If a valid document is required to meet the success criteria that 
    require something can be 'programmatically determined', invalid markup 
    documents cannot meet these success criteria, right?
    Johannes Koch
    Spem in alium nunquam habui praeter in te, Deus Israel.
                              (Thomas Tallis, 40-part motet)

[Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per recuperare la restante parte.]
Received on Monday, 7 November 2005 21:53:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:59:39 UTC