W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

RE: Validity as a technique

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:44:22 +0100
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <007c01c5e3d3$a7f93960$0200a8c0@rsnbiwa>



-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Yvette Hoitink
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 8:32 PM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: Validity as a technique


Did you understand my proposal? 

I agree with you that validity is a great factor in making sure things can
be programmatically determined which is why I want to include it in the
techniques for all these success criteria. I don't see why it is necessary
to put it in the guidelines as well. 

Roberto Scano:
Yes I've understand. 
But what about in the case of elements that are no part of DTD (the "<embed>
case")? Are we sure that all the other guidelines don't require
directly/indirectly validity? IMHO if a factor is repetitive, is best to
have a guideline.
Received on Monday, 7 November 2005 19:44:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:40 GMT