W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

RE: Validity

From: Bob Regan <bregan@macromedia.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 13:00:55 -0800
Message-ID: <DC9D05204B1E16419D62C12561C93221063B71AC@p01exm01.macromedia.com>
To: "Roberto Scano \(IWA/HWG\)" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>, <kerstin.goldsmith@oracle.com>
Cc: <gez.lemon@gmail.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Wrong. I hate to be so blunt but it is completely inappropriate to cast
this as such a narrow issue. 

The question at hand is what happens when invalid code is needed as
Kerstin defined or when valid code creates issues as you point up. Is
there a way for an author to address interoperability issues with tools,
user agents and at? 

Cheers,
Bob


------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
bob regan | macromedia | 415.832.5305

-----Original Message-----
From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) [mailto:rscano@iwa-italy.org] 
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 1:01 PM
To: kerstin.goldsmith@oracle.com
Cc: Bob Regan; gez.lemon@gmail.com; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Re: Validity



----- Messaggio originale -----
    Da: "Kerstin Goldsmith"<kerstin.goldsmith@oracle.com>
    Please read the notes, the email threads, and the minutes.
Everything 
    that is being discussed on the thread today has already been
discussed 
    in detail in the past.  How are we going to come to consensus over
this? 
    
Roberto:
This is what need a reply.
We are discussing about a single AT bug with a proprietary technology in
a single OS and with a single Browser...
Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 21:01:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:40 GMT