W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

RE: why validation in p1?

From: Robinson, Norman B - Washington, DC <Norman.B.Robinson@usps.gov>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:54:31 -0500
Message-ID: <EAF95052690D174A833DC58B15AB6A8819E8C8@WADCHQSXM24.usa.dce.usps.gov>
To: "Bob Regan" <bregan@macromedia.com>, "Maurizio Boscarol" <maurizio@usabile.it>, "W3C WAI" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Bob Regan asked "What happens if interoperability with AT is disrupted
by code that is
designated as valid?"

Then the AT vendors should fix their defective product. I've seen this
first hand in version releases where the previous version of a specific
assistive technology worked fine. We stayed with the 'old' version until
the newer version was (in this case) patched.


Norman B. Robinson
Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 17:54:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:57 UTC