W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

RE: Validity

From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpatrick@macromedia.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 07:58:36 -0800
Message-ID: <DC9D05204B1E16419D62C12561C93221063B6945@p01exm01.macromedia.com>
To: "Roberto Scano \(IWA/HWG\)" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

> Flash, imho, is like Java: an object with it's player that 
> should be directly accessible.

To me, directly accessible means no additional user agent (e.g. screen
reader) is needed.
I think you mean "able to deliver accessible information", including to
AT. Flash does this.

>  If i'm a flash developer and i work following your 
> guidelines for make this object directly accessible i pretend 
> that if i insert this object inside an html/xhtml page:
> - the object don't damage my code conformance
> - the browser, with your plugin installed, make contents accessible.

That's all correct.

> You instead are saying:
> - we have developed this with embed

I never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever said that we developed this
with the embed element.  Where are you reading this?  

Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 15:59:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:57 UTC