W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

Re: Validity

From: Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG) <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 14:02:17 +0100
To: <maurizio@usabile.it>, <gez.lemon@gmail.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <200511040756187.SM00784@Inbox>

    It' simple. Real case. You take an assistive technology and an invalid 
    page, and test. 

Ah wonderful! And what AT? With which configuration? And, at least, why wcag should lose time for test all AT?
Follow this idea, w3c will issue 1-2 spec. per year.
My question (never replyed) is always: why no Valid code? How elements can be programmatically determinated if an UA cannot parse correctly page code?
Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 12:59:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:59:39 UTC