W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > October to December 2005

[minutes] 6 October 2005

From: Wendy Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 17:28:11 -0400
Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20051006172626.033997c0@localhost>
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

Available at: <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/06-wai-wcag-minutes.html>

    [1]W3C

       [1] http://www.w3.org/

                                     WCAG WG

6 Oct 2005

    [2]Agenda

       [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005OctDec/0003.html

    See also: [3]IRC log

       [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/06-wai-wcag-irc

Attendees

    Present
           Gregg Vanderheiden, Ben Caldwell, Alex_Li, Loretta_Guarino_Reid,
           Wendy Chisholm , Roberto_Ellero, Sofia_Celic, Tim_Boland,
           Bengt_Farre, Katie_Haritos-Shea, Gian_Sampson-Wild, David_MacDonald,
           Don_Evans, Becky_Gibson (partial), Andi Snow-Weaver (partial)

    Regrets
           Roberto_Castaldo, John_Slatin, Sebastiano_Nutarelli, 
Bruno_von_Niman,
           WATANABE_Takayuki, Michael_Cooper, Luca_Mascaro, Christophe_Strobbe

    Chair
           Gregg

    Scribe
           wendy

Contents

      * [4]Topics
          1. [5]Check-in and assignements for next guidelines (15 minutes)
          2. [6]Team C: proposals, questions and updates (20 minutes)
          3. [7]Team B: proposals, questions and updates: (20 minutes)
          4. [8]Team A: proposals, questions and updates (20 minutes) survey
             results -
             http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20051004survey/results
      * [9]Summary of Action Items

      _________________________________________________________________



Check-in and assignements for next guidelines (15 minutes)

    team c - 1.3 (as well as 4.2 and 2.5)

    team b - 2.4 (as well as 1.2 and 3.1)

    team a - 2.2 (as well as 1.1 and 3.2)

    gv and bc are doing 2.3, 2.1, and 1.4

    editors are doing 4.1

    then have all of them worked for f2f

    plan is to go into f2f with drafts of everything and come out with a WD

Team C: proposals, questions and updates (20 minutes)

    should have 2.5 guide documents for next week

    1.3 has some guide document already -
    [10]http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-GENERAL/guideline1.3.html

      [10] http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-GENERAL/guideline1.3.html

    [11]http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/ - there is not yet an entry for 1.3,
    but anyone can create (ask ben or wendy for instructions)

      [11] http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/

    face-to-face agenda: day 1 - 5 guidelines, day 2 - 5 guidelines, day 3 - 3
    guidelines, conformance, checklist, day 4 - JIS, what's left, prep for
    november WD

    also, mapping - updates as needed (to publish as appendix)

Team B: proposals, questions and updates: (20 minutes)

    3.1 in good shape, 1.2 under way, 2.4 will need to alert the team

Team A: proposals, questions and updates (20 minutes) survey results -
[12]http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20051004survey/results

      [12] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20051004survey/results

    Issue 1488 Should L3 SC1 be removed?

    concern about tools to generate collated transcripts

    resolution: captions + audio descriptions would constitute a sufficient
    solution

    no one supports moving this from level 3 to level 2 (even though is 
priority
    1 in WCAG 1.0, as part of checkpoint 1.1)

    unclear that audio description is part of transcript as worded, "For
    prerecorded multimedia content, a combined transcript of captions and audio
    descriptions of video is available."

    we mean "collated transcript" but were trying to avoid that phrase

    <scribe> ACTION: gian propose rewrite of guideline 1.1 L3 sc 1 [recorded in
    [13]http://www.w3.org/2005/10/06-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action01]

    resolution: reword but don't remove 1.1 l3 sc1

    Revise example 2 and close issue 1561

    concern that short label should provide the info that could be easily
    gleaned from a quick glance at the bar chart

    concern about use of word "label" - a very charged word

    use text alternative instead

    a short text alternative says...a longer description...

    resolution: Example 2: a data chart. A bar chart compares how many widgets
    were sold in June, July, and August. A short text alternative says, "Figure
    one - Bar chart of sales in June, July and August." A longer description
    identifies the type of chart, provides a high-level summary of the data
    comparable to that available from the chart, and provides the data in a
    table

    close issue 1561

    resolution: Example 8: a traffic Web camera. A Web site allows end-users to
    select from a variety of Web cameras positioned throughout a major city to
    monitor traffic conditions. After a camera is selected, the image updates
    every 2 minutes. A short text alternative identifies the Web camera as, 
"Web
    camera view of traffic conditions at the corner of University and 
Park." The
    site also...
    ... provides a table of travel times for each of the routes covered by the
    Web cameras. The table information can be updated on request.

    then close issue 1562

    resolution: Close issue 1698

    Issue 1703

    resolution: close issue 1703

    issue 895

    resolution: close issue 895

    feedback on Guide to Guideline 3.2 Level 1 Success Criterion 1

    and guides for 3.2 Level 3 Success Criterion 1 and Guideline 3.2 Level 3
    Success Criterion 2 - team a will take that feedback back to the group.

Summary of Action Items

    [NEW] ACTION: gian propose rewrite of guideline 1.1 L3 sc 1 [recorded in
    [14]http://www.w3.org/2005/10/06-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action01]

    [End of minutes]

      _________________________________________________________________


     Minutes formatted by David Booth's [15]scribe.perl version 1.127 ([16]CVS
     log)
     $Date: 2005/10/06 21:23:07 $

      [15] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
      [16] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/

      _________________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2005 21:28:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:40 GMT