W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2005

RE: Tests 186, 187, 188, 189,

From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:48:25 +0200
To: "'Yvette Hoitink'" <y.p.hoitink@heritas.nl>, "'WCAG WG mailing list'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00cb01c59dcb$55209dd0$0200a8c0@rsnbiwa>



-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Yvette Hoitink
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 6:42 PM
To: 'WCAG WG mailing list'
Subject: RE: Tests 186, 187, 188, 189,

We're not talking about having multiple identical IDs, but having multiple
labels that belong to the same ID. So you wouldn't have the same ID twice,
you only refer to it twice. For example:

<label for="input1">First label describing option 1</label><input
id="input1" type="radio" value="1"><label for="input1">Second label
describing option 1</label>. This does not violate HTML spec and can have
accessibility benefits.

Roberto Scano:
Ok... I add myself to bugzilla (translation: I need holidays :D)
Touche :)
Received on Wednesday, 10 August 2005 16:48:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:39 GMT