Re: Balancing the myth-busting.

> As I believe that validity is important for
> accessibility, I believe the results from the markup validator belong
> in the results. Obviously, anyone who doesn't believe that validity 
is
> important for accessibility can just discard the markup validator
> results.

Gez, even if validity is important for accessibility, it is still 
weaker than accessibility. Accessibility puts more constraints on the 
author than just validity. So comparing a validity checker to an 
accessibility checker is still apples and oranges. Especially when 
your point is that the automatic checkers are missing accessibility 
problems.

Loretta

Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2005 18:21:12 UTC