- From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
- Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 17:36:11 +0200 (CEST)
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 9 Aug, Joe Clark wrote: >>And the validator finds no errors on the page, since the validator >>does not support Javascript - naturally - and hence see the >>*original*, target-less, source. > > The validator's limitations make its results incorrect. Hence it is > exactly the sort of edge case Gez's document was intended to test. Not really. The article was aimed at testing accessibility tools. The validator test syntax, and it does exactly what it says on the box. If the client or author *changes* that syntax, that is a different matter. We must stress the correct use of the correct tools. Both automated and non-automated testing have their place. -- - Tina Holmboe Greytower Technologies tina@greytower.net http://www.greytower.net/ [+46] 0708 557 905
Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2005 15:36:21 UTC