W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: [techs] What makes a good test?

From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 19:56:28 +0200
Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20050801194818.03007730@mailserv.esat.kuleuven.be>
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org

Hi,

At 17:52 1/08/2005, Tim Boland wrote:
>This is a resource for consideration in the current test case reviews.
>According to Question #7 of TestFAQ [1]:
>
><quote>
>A good test is:
>
>(...)
>2       Atomic (tests a single feature rather than multiple features)

There is nothing wrong with a test that tests multiple features; atomic tests
simply have a higher priority. A test suite with "complex tests" would be huge,
but that does not make those tests "bad".

>(...)
></quote>
>
>Thanks and best wishes
>Tim Boland NIST


Regards,

Christophe Strobbe


>(...)
>[1]: http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2005/01/test-faq#good

-- 
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on 
Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/ 
Received on Monday, 1 August 2005 17:57:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:39 GMT