W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2005

RE: John's proposed wording for Principle 4

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:17:58 -0500
Message-Id: <43vtj8$11sflec@mxip08a.cluster1.charter.net>
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

Maybe we go with this one and then revisit when we have finalized the
category 4 guidelines.

Other thoughts? 

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Neil Whiteley
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 9:55 PM
To: 'Gregg Vanderheiden'
Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: John's proposed wording for Principle 4

Anyone think of a fix or way to not sound so ....... hard to achieve? (Since
we can never really make things so that they will work with all future

How about:

4. Content is able to work with current and developing technologies

Received on Monday, 18 July 2005 05:20:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:55 UTC