W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: John's proposed wording for Principle 4

From: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.its.unimelb.edu.au>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:50:05 +1000
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Message-ID: <20050718035005.GA8505@jdc>

What happened to the original idea that all principles should be written 
as imperatives? We decided that success criteria couldn't be 
imperatives, but principles could.

"Robust" seems as good a word as any for principle 4 - "Design content 
to be robust" or "technologically robust" or "interoperable" or "for 
Received on Monday, 18 July 2005 03:51:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:55 UTC