Hi Gregg, At 23:25 12/07/2005, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: >(...) >AGENDA > >(...) >2. Harvest techniques and/or tests for guidelines 3.2, 4.1 and 4.2. >(Note: Since there are no techniques in guideline 4.1 in the current >public draft, we will be working from the success criterion that were >proposed in the 13-16 June face to face at http://tinyurl.com/clprn.) On 20 June, I sent a new proposal for well-formedness to the list (http://tinyurl.com/dodse) because well-formedness does not apply to SGML. (I mentioned the proposal on the 23 June conference call: http://tinyurl.com/cffnr). Regards, Christophe Strobbe -- Christophe Strobbe K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on Document Architectures Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM tel: +32 16 32 85 51 http://www.docarch.be/Received on Thursday, 14 July 2005 18:38:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:39 GMT