W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > July to September 2005

RE: Challenges on JavaScript Techniques

From: David MacDonald <befree@magma.ca>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 15:46:54 -0400
Message-Id: <200507081946.j68JksVm014956@mail2.magma.ca>
To: "'Joe Clark'" <joeclark@joeclark.org>, "'WAI-GL'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

I agree

.Access empowers people
            .barriers disable them.

 www.eramp.com


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Joe Clark
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 12:31 PM
To: WAI-GL
Subject: Re: Challenges on JavaScript Techniques


On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Peter-Paul Koch wrote:

> I am willing to devote some time to creating good examples of accessible 
> JavaScript... I am considered an JavaScript expert in web develoment 
> circles.

Indeed, PPK is considered an expert. The WCAG Working Group has a 
reprehensible recent history of simply ignoring outside expert advice. 
("Semantics," people. "Semantics.") You don't have enough expert bodies to 
work on JavaScript techniques; you've now been offered another expert 
body. I fully expect the Working Group to either:

* ignore the offer
* deny that PPK is an expert
* dispute the definition of "expert" since it already has a sense in the 
W3C lexicon

Don't look a gift horse in the mouth. Take PPK up on his offer.

-- 

     Joe Clark | joeclark@joeclark.org
     Accessibility <http://joeclark.org/access/>
       --This.
       --What's wrong with top-posting?
Received on Friday, 8 July 2005 19:47:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:39 GMT