Becky Gibson wrote: <blockquote> I would not assume that background audio only interferes with text reading software. It also might distract those with reading disabilities -although they may not be using any assistive technology. Another, more generic wording might be <proposal 2>"A mechanism is available to turn off background audio that plays automatically so that the audio does not interfere with the user's interaction with the remaining content." </proposal 2> </blockquote> John: I like this! Thanks, Becky. John "Good design is accessible design." John Slatin, Ph.D. Director, Accessibility Institute University of Texas at Austin FAC 248C 1 University Station G9600 Austin, TX 78712 ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524 email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/ <http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/> -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Becky_Gibson@notesdev.ibm.com Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 1:39 pm To: John M Slatin Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org; w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org Subject: Re: Impact of not setting baseline and writing SC as functional outcomes great work going through all of the success criteria and submitting several proposals to address the issue! I have a modified proposal for GL 1.4 level 2 success criterion 3. <excerpt from john's post> GL 1.4 level 2 success criterion 3: Users can disable background audio that plays automatically on a page so that it does not interfere with text reading software they may be using Impacted: yes <proposed>"A mechanism is available to turn off background audio that plays automatically. So that the audio does not interfere with text-reading software that may be in use.</proposed> </john> <becky's proposed>"A mechanism is available to turn off background audio that plays automatically so that the audio does not interfere with assistive technology that may be in use. </becky's proposed> I would not assume that background audio only interferes with text reading software. It also might distract those with reading disabilities -although they may not be using any assistive technology. Another, more generic wording might be <proposal 2>"A mechanism is available to turn off background audio that plays automatically so that the audio does not interfere with the user's interaction with the remaining content." </proposal 2> -becky Becky Gibson Web Accessibility Architect IBM Emerging Internet Technologies 5 Technology Park Drive Westford, MA 01886 Voice: 978 399-6101; t/l 333-6101 Email: gibsonb@us.ibm.com <mailto:gibsonb@us.ibm.com>Received on Thursday, 31 March 2005 20:49:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2007 14:55:45 GMT