W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2005

RE: Possible added SC to 2.5

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:41:17 -0600
To: "'David MacDonald'" <befree@magma.ca>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <auto-000219157333@spamarrest.com>
I think that wording is too general.  If I was filling out a form - then it
would have to list every piece of paper or record as well as knowledge that
I needed. 

 

Can you restrict this to forms? And fields?

 

Also -  also this looks like something everyone would need.  Not just people
with disabilities.   Am I missing something? 

                                            


Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 

 

 


  _____  


From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of David MacDonald
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 11:51 AM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Possible added SC to 2.5

I have been working on General Techniques for Guideline 2.5. 

 

I recommend that we add a SC to this guideline perhaps as SC level 2 item 4,
that says something like.

 

"Information that is required for the successful completion of the
interaction is clearly identified."

 

--------

I'm speaking about a line at the top of a document that says something like:

 

required fields are marked with an *

 

or 

 

required fields are marked with "(required)"

 

David MacDonald

 

 

.Access empowers people.

            .Barriers disable them..

 

www.eramp.com <http://www.eramp.com/> 
Received on Friday, 18 February 2005 21:42:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:35 GMT