W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2005

RE: General Techniques...

From: Alistair Garrison <alistair.garrison@accessinmind.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:47:16 +0100
To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20050211094719.41CBF37E65@smtp2-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net>
Dear All, 

 

I agree.

 

To my mind, I still believe it might be far less confusing to the reader if
the guidance provided through the General techniques document was written
directly into each technology specific techniques document (i.e. HTML, CSS,
etc.) as specific techniques, examples and tests - removing, the need for
the General Techniques document entirely.

 

This might also help to straighten them out, getting the techniques where
they belong.

 

Alistair 

 

 

  _____  

From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Gregg Vanderheiden
Sent: 10 February 2005 18:20
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: General Techniques...

 

This is a problem.  And we do need to straighten them out. 

 

Also we could have a link that would patch the general on the specific.  But
they are organized differently and I don't think we  can shuffle them
together.  And I don't think we should maintain them already shuffled or the
text will vary from one to another over time. 

 

We are working on getting the techniques where they belong. They currently
are mixed up. 

 

 
Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 

  _____  

From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Alistair Garrison
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 10:24 AM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: General Techniques...

 

Dear All, 

 

Over the past weeks I have been undertaking an end-to-end analysis of the
WCAG 2.0 Guidelines and Techniques (as far as reasonably possible).

 

The issue I come across most is the fact Technology Specific techniques and
General techniques don't seem to line up - leaving me confused about what I
need to do for conformance to WCAG 2.0.  You can find technology specific
techniques which go too far and specify things which should be left to the
General techniques i.e. specified values for alt text; or General techniques
which are over-extended to talk about technology specific things i.e.
captions, mathematical expressions, video.     

 

Again, I state that this is causing me a great deal of confusion, and I'm
sure others are finding (or will find) the same thing.

 

To my mind, it might be far less confusing to the reader if the guidance
provided through the General techniques document was written directly into
each technology specific techniques document (i.e. HTML, CSS, etc.) as
specific techniques, examples and tests - removing, the need for the General
Techniques document entirely.

 

I would be very interested to hear the thoughts and comments of others on
this matter.

 

Alistair 

 

Alistair Garrison 

Managing Director 

Accessinmind Limited UK Filial

 

Tel.: 0046 8 44 65 287
Website: http://www.accessinmind.com
 
IMPORTANT: This e-mail, including any attachments, is for the addressee   
only.  It may contain privileged and/or confidential information.  If it   
has come to you in error, please notify the sender immediately.  If you   
are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy, print,   
distribute or rely on its contents.  All e-mails and any attachments are
believed, but not warranted, to be virus free.  However, all e-mails   
should be virus checked before being downloaded and we accept no  
responsibility therefore. 

 
Received on Friday, 11 February 2005 09:47:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:35 GMT