W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2005

RE: [techs] tests 50, 51, 53 and 54 - title

From: Michael Cooper <michaelc@watchfire.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 10:56:57 -0500
Message-ID: <A0666B3C59F1634290FDC88674D87C3202124B81@1WFEMAIL.ottawa.watchfire.com>
To: "WAI WCAG List" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

HI - your explanation makes sense to me, so I withdraw my suggestion here. :) Michael

> > Test 54: I almost got confused because while the <title>
> > elements represent the issue of not describing the
> > document properly, the <h1> elements don't represent
> > that issue. Just for clarity it might be useful if the <h1>
> > of the "fail" test file were "History of Turtles" to repeat
> > the confusion.
> >
> The test file that fails (54-1) is meant to show that the 
> title "history of
> turtles" does not describe the document which talks only 
> about birds. If I
> change the H1 header so it also contains something about 
> turtles then I
> think it confuses the issue. The document will then have some 
> text about
> turtles so the title may be appropriate.
> 
> Here are some other examples of bad titles:
> "new page"
> "page 1"
> "my paper"
> "Monday February 7"
> 
> Would using one of these titles make the 'bad' example clearer?
> 
> Chris
> 
> Links to test cases under discussion below:
> 
> > > 50 - Document contains a TITLE element.
> > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/test50.html
> > >
> > > 51 - TITLE is not empty
> > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/test51.html
> > >
> > > 53 - TITLE is not placeholder text
> > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/test53.html
> > >
> > > 54 - TITLE describes the document.
> > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/test54.html
> > >
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2005 15:56:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:35 GMT