In our recent straw poll, the group accepted the test for d-link: test 9 - All IMG elements that have a LONGDESC attribute also have an associated 'd-link'. http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/tests/test9.html However there were several people that voted for killing it and most people voted that it be "optional". I thought we should have some discussion on the list as a result of the close decision. The "d-link" was a temporary measure to support image long descriptions until there was user agent support for the LONGDESC attribute. We know that d-link will eventually be not required so the question is - when? Is there yet enough user agent support for LONGDESC that we should not require d-link? How do we judge when there is enough support for LONGDESC that we can dump d-link. Is there something we can do to increase the support of LONGDESC so d-link can be quickly removed? Note that d-link is currently a level 1 requirement because it maps to guideline 1.1, Level 1, Success Criteria 2. I believe that it should be a level 2 or level 3 requirement. Comments appreciated. Cheers, ChrisReceived on Friday, 21 January 2005 15:23:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:35 GMT