W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > January to March 2005

RE: ALT and TITLE Clarification

From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:13:16 -0600
To: "'Chris Ridpath'" <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>, "'John M Slatin'" <john_slatin@austin.utexas.edu>
Cc: "'Jim Thatcher'" <jim@jimthatcher.com>, "'WAI WCAG List'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, <geoff_freed@wgbh.org>
Message-ID: <auto-000216905628@spamarrest.com>

Yes that would be good. 
Otherwise they become requirements instead of test points. 


 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Chris Ridpath
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 3:15 PM
To: John M Slatin
Cc: Jim Thatcher; WAI WCAG List; geoff_freed@wgbh.org
Subject: Re: ALT and TITLE Clarification

>"Alt text must identify the purpose or function of the image."
> Just a reminder that we need to re-word
> the test so that it's a
> true/false proposition-- replace
> "must be" with "a declarative...
Each test has a true/false proposition statement in the "expected results"
statement. e.g.
"The Alt text for each image used as a link identifies the purpose or
function of the image."

I've left the test names with the "must" statements because it seemed to be
more reader friendly. Hmmm, should all the test names be changed to the
true/false statement?

Received on Thursday, 13 January 2005 22:13:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:52 UTC