Please note it is still passover until next week

Thanks
Lisa


John M Slatin wrote:
Message
Hello, everyone.
 
This is a reminder that on the Thursday call this coming week (28 April) we'll be trying to reach consensus on proposals relating to the following guidelines:
 
2.4
4.2
1.1
1.3
 
The people working on these issue summaries and proposals need your response, so that they can address concerns raised by the Working Group as well as those listed in Bugzilla.
So please post your responses to the issue summaries as soon as possible (by Sunday evening for 2.4; Monday for 4.2, 1.1, and 1.3).
 
Starting points:
2.4 Issue summary at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005AprJun/0169.html
(see also the the responses that have already been posted)
 
Issue summary and related analyses for 4.2:
1. Guideline 4.2 subgroup report: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005AprJun/0158.html
2. UAAG Priority 1 Checkpoint summary: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005AprJun/0159.html
3. Wendy's analysis of Web applications vs. user agents: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005AprJun/0160.html
4. Wendy's analysis of UAAG Guideline 6: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005AprJun/0162.html
5. Loretta's analysis of UAAG Guideline 9: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005AprJun/0163.html
 
Issues for 1.1
Thinking aloud: definitions, etc.: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005AprJun/0172.html
 
 
Issue summary and proposal for 1.3
1. Issue summary: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005AprJun/0150.html
2. Action item: rewriting guideline 1.3: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2005AprJun/0145.html

 

 

Thanks much for your hard work!

 

John

 

"Good design is accessible design."

Dr. John M. Slatin, Director
Accessibility Institute
University of Texas at Austin
FAC 248C
1 University Station G9600
Austin, TX 78712
ph 512-495-4288, fax 512-495-4524
email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu
Web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility